<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Book &#039;Forecast Scheduling&#039; Feedback Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://projectprocorp.com/blog</link>
	<description>Forecast Scheduling Feedback Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:26:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>p629 Set Options first before trying the udpate methods</title>
		<link>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=79</link>
		<comments>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=79#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Uyttewaal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Section &#8220;Choosing the Options for Updating Tasks&#8221; should be placed in front of &#8220;The Quickest Way to Update tasks in Your Schedule&#8221; and &#8220;The Thorough Way to Update tasks in Your Schedule&#8221;. Indeed I assume that what you wrote &#8230; <a href="http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=79">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Section &#8220;Choosing the Options for Updating Tasks&#8221; should be placed in front of &#8220;The Quickest Way to Update tasks in Your Schedule&#8221; and &#8220;The Thorough Way to Update tasks in Your Schedule&#8221;.<br />
Indeed I assume that what you wrote on pg 630 takes into account the<br />
recommended settings of pg 632.<br />
Kind regards,<br />
Marc Rottiers<br />
Civil Engineer<br />
Belgium</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=79</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Page 457+458: www.CP2dot0.org redirect</title>
		<link>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=63</link>
		<comments>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=63#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Uyttewaal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Critical Path 2.0 standard is not published on www.CP2dot0.org. Instead the standard was published on the PMI-SCOP (Scheduling Community of Practice) in the Wikis section. You can access it by: - browsing to http://scheduling.vc.pmi.org/Public/Home.aspx - logging in with your &#8230; <a href="http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=63">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Critical Path 2.0 standard is not published on <em>www.CP2dot0.org</em>. Instead the standard was published on the PMI-SCOP (Scheduling Community of Practice) in the Wikis section. You can access it by:<br />
- browsing to <em>http://scheduling.vc.pmi.org/Public/Home.aspx</em><br />
- logging in with your own PMI membership<br />
- clicking <strong>Community, Wikis, All Pages </strong>and you will see the Critical Path 2.0 standard listed</p>
<p>Feel free to contribute to the standard by editing the document; it is a wiki after all!</p>
<p>Eric Uyttewaal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=63</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Page 525 and 730 erroneous check 9.10</title>
		<link>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=23</link>
		<comments>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=23#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Uyttewaal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical error]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectprocorp.com/new/blog/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check 9.9 is listed in the book as &#8220;Resource-Critical Path: &#8230;&#8221; but this should not have been listed as check 9.9. Check 9.10 should have been check 9.9.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check 9.9 is listed in the book as &#8220;Resource-Critical Path: &#8230;&#8221; but this should not have been listed as check 9.9. Check 9.10 should have been check 9.9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=23</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Page 645: Split in-Progress tasks and &#8220;retained logic&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=21</link>
		<comments>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=21#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 16:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Uyttewaal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical Error]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectprocorp.com/new/blog/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As opposed to previous versions, Project 2010 does not allow you to &#8220;retain logic&#8221; and always seems to apply &#8220;progress override&#8221;; remaining duration of the task and its successors are moved back to the status date.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As opposed to previous versions, Project 2010 does not allow you to &#8220;retain logic&#8221; and always seems to apply &#8220;progress override&#8221;; remaining duration of the task and its successors are moved back to the status date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=21</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Page 616: Screenshot: &#8220;Start&#8221; should be &#8220;Scheduled Start&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=19</link>
		<comments>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=19#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 16:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Uyttewaal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical Error]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectprocorp.com/new/blog/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unlike as shown in the screenshot: Start should be Scheduled Start Finish should be Scheduled Finish Otherwise, the filter will not work and will produce an error. The fields Start and Finish are text fields in Project 2010 instead of &#8230; <a href="http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=19">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike as shown in the screenshot:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Start</strong> should be <strong>Scheduled Start</strong></li>
<li><strong>Finish</strong> should be <strong>Scheduled Finish</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>Otherwise, the filter will not work and will produce an error. The fields <strong>Start</strong> and <strong>Finish</strong> are text fields in Project 2010 instead of date fields, which was necessary for the <strong>Manually Scheduled </strong>tasks new feature in Project 2010 (that allows you to write text into the <strong>Start </strong>and <strong>Finish </strong>fields). In previous releases, the <strong>Start </strong>field was a date field, and in Project 2010 this field was renamed to <strong>Scheduled Start</strong>. Similar for the <strong>Finish </strong>field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=19</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Page 598 step 4: &#8220;Click ribbon Project&#8221; should be &#8220;Click ribbon View&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=14</link>
		<comments>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=14#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 16:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Uyttewaal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical Error]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectprocorp.com/new/blog/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First submitted by Pierre Martinelli]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First submitted by Pierre Martinelli</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=14</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Page 302: Enterprise Team Member</title>
		<link>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=4</link>
		<comments>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?p=4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Uyttewaal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical Error]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectprocorp.com/new/blog/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The filter on the field Enterprise Team Member does not work in Project 2010 as it did in Project 2007; you cannot filter the project team members as described in Project 2010.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The filter on the field <strong>Enterprise Team Member </strong>does not work in Project 2010 as it did in Project 2007; you cannot filter the project team members as described in Project 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://projectprocorp.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

